CS KAIROS · LEARNING LIBRARY

M03-04 · Open, Closed and Filtered states

Connect Open, Closed, Filtered and other states to observation location, method and response, then choose the next check.

CEH M03-04 | Open, Closed, Filtered: Turn Port States into Evidence-Based Judgments

In one sentence: a port state interprets the response obtained from this location, with this method, in this test; recording the state alongside its response evidence helps you choose the next verification step.

The previous unit introduced TCP Connect, SYN, and UDP scans. Today we focus on interpreting results: when we see open, closed, or filtered, how can we understand and document them and use them to validate our own services and firewall settings?

1 | Start with extensions in an office building

Imagine calling an office building:

- Someone answers the requested extension: a service is available along this communication path.

- The switchboard explicitly says nobody currently answers that extension: you have received a concrete rejection response.

- The switchboard blocks external calls according to policy: you are observing an access policy's effect; you can check its access conditions with the administrator next.

A port can initially be understood as an extension number through which a network program receives communications. An IP address (Internet Protocol address) helps packets reach a network endpoint; the transport protocol and port further distinguish the communication method and service entry point.

For example, “TCP 443 on 192.0.2.20” and “UDP 443 on 192.0.2.20” are two entry points to check separately. TCP stands for Transmission Control Protocol; UDP stands for User Datagram Protocol.

All addresses and scenarios in this lesson are synthetic teaching examples. Practical work remains within your own isolated lab and equipment approved in advance.

2 | Distinguish the three core states first

Nmap is a network discovery and security auditing tool. It classifies ports according to the probe method and responses. This lesson focuses on three states:

StatePlain-language meaningWhat does the administrator check next?
openThe probe indicates that a service accepts the corresponding communication at this entry pointService purpose, authorized users, version, and protection settings
closedA definite response leads the tool to classify the entry point as having no listening serviceWhether the expected service is running and bound to the correct location
filteredProbe results fit a filtering situation; other evidence will clarify whether the entry point is openFirewall rules, the path, and related records

The key is the observation perspective. The same management entry point can accept connections from a management subnet while probes from other subnets are filtered. Both results can be correct: each describes its own access conditions. Nmap: port states

Writing “TCP 443 tested open from the management subnet” makes a result easier for others to reproduce and verify than simply writing “443 is open.”

Three core states: different next steps

Parallel categories and observation conditions, with no flow arrows.

The whole diagram scales proportionally to this column. Small screens also shrink its text; open the original SVG to zoom, or read the explanation below.

Three core states: different next steps Parallel categories and observation conditions, with no flow arrows. Three core states: different next steps open A service accepts corresponding communication Check purpose, version, and protection closed A definite response indicates no listener Check the running program and binding filtered Probe results indicate filtering Check path, rules, and logs Shared context: observation perspective Source location + method + time One entry point can have different access conditions Pair each state with evidence and a next step.
How to read the diagram
Parallel categories and observation conditions, with no flow arrows.

Parallel cards compare categories; their order does not imply a process.

  1. open

    A service accepts corresponding communication

    Check purpose, version, and protection

  2. closed

    A definite response indicates no listener

    Check the running program and binding

  3. filtered

    Probe results indicate filtering

    Check path, rules, and logs

  4. Shared context: observation perspective

    Source location + method + time

    One entry point can have different access conditions

Pair each state with evidence and a next step.

3 | TCP SYN scans: read three states from responses

SYN is the TCP flag used to initiate a connection; ACK indicates acknowledgment; RST is the connection-reset flag. A flag is a field in a packet that expresses a control meaning.

For an ordinary TCP SYN scan, this table explains common results:

Probe sentResponse observedCommon classification
SYNSYN/ACK: the peer responds to the connection requestopen
SYNRST: a reset responseclosed
SYNStill no response after retries, or certain unreachable messagesfiltered

ICMP stands for Internet Control Message Protocol, which carries control information such as network errors. For example, an ICMP response indicating that communication is administratively prohibited can help explain restrictions along the path.

Nmap's SYN scan maps received messages to states; retries and waiting are part of that interpretation process. Therefore, preserve the scan method when recording results. Nmap: TCP SYN scan

A useful reading habit: put “received RST” in the observation column and “Nmap classified it as closed” in the interpretation column, then check the device's listening-service state. This connects network responses to device settings.

TCP defines processing rules for RST, and network devices can also generate responses according to policy. Checking the response source, host records, and firewall records helps establish the cause. TCP specification: RFC 9293

TCP SYN: responses and states

Parallel comparison of three common SYN-scan responses and recording practice.

The whole diagram scales proportionally to this column. Small screens also shrink its text; open the original SVG to zoom, or read the explanation below.

TCP SYN: responses and states Parallel comparison of three common SYN-scan responses and recording practice. TCP SYN: responses and states SYN/ACK received → open The peer responds to the connection request Check the service and allowed sources RST received → closed Record the reset as an observation Check listening settings on the device Silence / certain ICMP errors → filtered Preserve waiting and retry conditions Check policy and path records For each result: method and response Method: TCP SYN scan Separate observation, classification, and evidence These are alternative results under one method.
How to read the diagram
Parallel comparison of three common SYN-scan responses and recording practice.

Parallel cards compare categories; their order does not imply a process.

  1. SYN/ACK received → open

    The peer responds to the connection request

    Check the service and allowed sources

  2. RST received → closed

    Record the reset as an observation

    Check listening settings on the device

  3. Silence / certain ICMP errors → filtered

    Preserve waiting and retry conditions

    Check policy and path records

  4. For each result: method and response

    Method: TCP SYN scan

    Separate observation, classification, and evidence

These are alternative results under one method.

4 | UDP silence keeps two possibilities open

UDP sends messages as datagrams without TCP's connection-establishing three-way handshake. After receiving data, an application may reply, or it may process only requests matching its expected format.

That makes open|filtered particularly important when reading UDP scans. Here, the “|” separates two candidate states: open, or filtered.

Observation after a UDP probeCommon Nmap classificationNext verification step
A corresponding UDP responseopenCheck the response content and service settings
IPv4 ICMP “port unreachable,” Type 3 / Code 3closedCheck the program listening at that entry point
Other ICMP errors that meet the filtering criteriafilteredCheck the path and policy
Still no response after retriesopen|filteredCompare service logs, firewall logs, and a suitable service-specific test

For example, a UDP service that processes only a particular data format may remain silent when the probe does not match it; a firewall dropping the probe may produce the same visible result. Keeping both candidates tells us what kind of evidence to gather next. Nmap: UDP scan

Read the scan method first, the response second, and the state last. This order explains why a TCP SYN timeout is commonly classified as filtered, whereas a UDP timeout is commonly classified as open|filtered.

UDP: four observations and next steps

Parallel UDP-response categories; silence preserves two possibilities.

The whole diagram scales proportionally to this column. Small screens also shrink its text; open the original SVG to zoom, or read the explanation below.

UDP: four observations and next steps Parallel UDP-response categories; silence preserves two possibilities. UDP: four observations and next steps Corresponding UDP reply → open Response content is available to check Verify service settings IPv4 ICMP Type 3 / Code 3 → closed Port unreachable Check the program listening at the entry point Other qualifying ICMP errors → filtered Interpret filtering from the message Check the path and policy No response after retries → open|filtered Keep both open and filtered as candidates Compare format, service logs, and firewall logs Read method, then response, then state.
How to read the diagram
Parallel UDP-response categories; silence preserves two possibilities.

Parallel cards compare categories; their order does not imply a process.

  1. Corresponding UDP reply → open

    Response content is available to check

    Verify service settings

  2. IPv4 ICMP Type 3 / Code 3 → closed

    Port unreachable

    Check the program listening at the entry point

  3. Other qualifying ICMP errors → filtered

    Interpret filtering from the message

    Check the path and policy

  4. No response after retries → open|filtered

    Keep both open and filtered as candidates

    Compare format, service logs, and firewall logs

Read method, then response, then state.

5 | Two other labels: understand the question they answer

Alongside the three core states and open|filtered, Nmap has two further states:

- unfiltered: the probe has not encountered filtering as observed by that method. ACK scans commonly use this classification to describe a probe receiving a response; an appropriate additional method checks whether a service is open.

- closed|filtered: closed or filtered. This classification is used by the particular IP ID idle-scan technique. For this unit, remember that it also preserves candidate states.

ACK scans examine filtering-rule behavior; SYN scans help distinguish open, closed, and filtered ports. They ask different questions, so read each result together with its method. Nmap: scan techniques and classifications

Memory aid: open concerns a service accepting communication, closed a definite rejection response, and filtered a filtering interpretation; labels containing “|” preserve two verification directions.

6 | Read a complete synthetic case

Suppose you are assigned to validate a lab test server. Prior approval limits checks to TCP 443, TCP 8443, and UDP 53, with two observation locations: the management subnet and an ordinary test subnet.

Here are the teaching example's summarized results:

Location / methodEntry pointResponse evidenceClassification
Management subnet / SYNTCP 443SYN/ACKopen
Ordinary test subnet / SYNTCP 443No response after retriesfiltered
Management subnet / SYNTCP 8443RSTclosed
Management subnet / UDPUDP 53No response after retriesopen|filtered

Next, organize them around the task's purpose:

First, TCP 443 produces different results from the two observation locations. If the requirement was “management-subnet access only,” this is a useful lead for further validation. The administrator can compare allow and deny rules and logs from around the test time.

Second, TCP 8443 is closed. If the service should run there, check whether its program is running, listening on that port, and bound only to a particular interface. If no service was planned there, compare the result with the asset inventory.

Third, UDP 53 remains open|filtered. DNS stands for Domain Name System. If the device is expected to provide DNS, use an approved query in the service's expected format and compare DNS and firewall records, letting the next evidence resolve the remaining question.

The lesson from this case is: a state is a signpost for verification work, rather than a rating. Each result points to a clear next step.

7 | Write scan reports others can reproduce

A useful record includes at least:

1. Target and authorized scope: device, IP address, transport protocol, port, and approved purpose.

2. Observation conditions: source subnet, date/time and time zone, scan method, tool version, and important settings.

3. Result and reason: the state displayed by the tool and the corresponding packet or error response.

4. Cross-checking evidence: listening-service settings, application logs, firewall rules, and firewall logs.

5. Follow-up: differences between expected and observed results, the responsible person, and approved retesting arrangements.

Nmap's `--reason` option displays reasons for state classifications, helping document why a result entered a particular category; retaining original output also supports before-and-after comparisons. Nmap: output and classification reasons

For example:

“From the management test subnet, we used TCP SYN probes against port 443 on the test host, received SYN/ACK, and obtained an open classification. Next, we will check service settings and allowed sources against the change request and retain firewall logs from the same period.”

Separating observation, interpretation, and action makes the progress of verification easy to follow.

Build a reproducible verification record

Move from test conditions to observation, cross-checking, and an approved next step.

The whole diagram scales proportionally to this column. Small screens also shrink its text; open the original SVG to zoom, or read the explanation below.

Build a reproducible verification record Move from test conditions to observation, cross-checking, and an approved next step. Build a reproducible verification record 1 | Record test conditions Target, authorized scope, and source subnet Time zone, method, version, and settings 2 | Separate observation and interpretation Preserve responses and original output Record tool state and the --reason explanation 3 | Cross-check the design Listening settings and application logs Firewall rules and records from the same period 4 | Plan the next step Expected versus observed results and owner Arrange a retest within the approved scope Keep traceable evidence at each step.
How to read the diagram
Move from test conditions to observation, cross-checking, and an approved next step.

Arrows show the teaching sequence; each step has its stated conditions.

  1. 1 | Record test conditions

    Target, authorized scope, and source subnet

    Time zone, method, version, and settings

  2. 2 | Separate observation and interpretation

    Preserve responses and original output

    Record tool state and the --reason explanation

  3. 3 | Cross-check the design

    Listening settings and application logs

    Firewall rules and records from the same period

  4. 4 | Plan the next step

    Expected versus observed results and owner

    Arrange a retest within the approved scope

Keep traceable evidence at each step.

8 | Validate protection according to its design

From a protection perspective, organize checks into three layers:

- Service layer: every open entry point has a business purpose, a maintainer, and an update plan; disable unnecessary services.

- Access layer: configure rules around required sources and purposes; restrict management entry points to management subnets or approved channels.

- Validation layer: test separately from allowed and restricted observation locations, compare service settings and logs, and confirm that results match the design.

For example, a public website entry point and an administrator-only entry point have different policy objectives even when both are open. Judge whether a result meets requirements by considering the asset's purpose and access policy together.

This lesson practices reading synthetic output and designing verification records; actual probing follows the authorized scope, approved rate, and maintenance arrangements.

9 | Quick check: translate states into next steps

Try answering in your own words first:

1. The same TCP 443 tests open from the management subnet and filtered from another subnet. How would you explain these results, and what two kinds of evidence would you add?

2. What states commonly correspond to a TCP SYN probe receiving RST and a UDP probe receiving no response after retries, respectively?

3. When an ACK scan reports unfiltered, how would you check next whether the service is open?

4. A report says only “UDP 53 open|filtered.” Add at least four pieces of information that would help an administrator continue verification.

Today's takeaway: combine “observation location + scan method + response evidence + state + next step” to turn scan results into records that support validation and collaboration.

Next, M03-05 introduces service versions and banner information to understand what service an open entry point provides.

Reference answer: 1. One entry point, different locations

The two results describe access conditions for different sources: the management subnet's SYN probe receives a response accepting a connection, while probes from the other subnet show filtering. If policy permits only the management subnet, this is a lead for further validation. Add two categories of evidence: first, the service's listening and binding settings; second, firewall allow/deny rules and logs from the same period. Compare the source, time, and method together to check whether the results match the design.

Reference answer: 2. RST and UDP silence

A TCP SYN probe receiving RST is commonly classified as **closed**. A UDP probe still receiving no response after retries is commonly classified as **open|filtered**: the service may respond only to correctly formatted data, while path filtering can also produce silence. Preserve the original response evidence and test conditions, then check service and firewall records.

Reference answer: 3. The next step after unfiltered

An ACK scan's unfiltered result means that this probe receives a response; its focus is filtering behavior. Next, within the approved scope, use an appropriate method such as TCP SYN or Connect to observe whether a service accepts connections, and compare the device's listening settings. To establish the application's purpose, follow with an approved application-layer check.

Reference answer: 4. Complete the verification record

Add at least four items, such as the target IP address and approved purpose, source subnet, time and time zone, UDP scan method and tool version, waiting/retry settings, probe data format, original no-response output and classification reason, listening settings and DNS logs, or firewall rules and logs. Retain UDP 53's transport protocol and port number, and identify the next approved service-format query and responsible person so others can reproduce the test and continue the work.

Concept Q&A

Pending: related questions will be edited into anonymous teaching notes when available.